The final outcome of the argument, â€śClearly, our overall health continuously decline as lengthy once we persist within our technological advances, â€ť rests weakly on three primary presumptions. [THESIS STATEMENT &lifier TOPICâ€™S CONCLUSION] First, it assumes that advances in medicine won't combat the harmful results of deficiencies in exercise. [REASON 1] Second, it takes the tacit thought that the consequence of healthy diet on health is minor as compared to the results of an inactive lifestyle. [REASON 2] Finally, it presumes that whatever is true within the last and offer may also hold true for future years. [REASON 3]
The argument assumes the results of standard exercise on health override any results caused by advances in medicine. [Subject SENTENCE FOR REASON 1] As society becomes progressively hi-tech, we may plausibly reason that medicine will similarly develop and advance. Nevertheless, the validity from the authorâ€™s argument is dependent on the concept that medicine won't advance as quickly as technology or, at the minimum, on the concept that any advance in medicine have a relatively minor impact on health, in comparison towards the results of physical exercise. What can happen if medicine progresses so that healthcare can combat the results of the sedentary lifestyle? Might we make a pill or method that could easily and effectively combat cardiovascular disease, diabetes, along with other illnesses associated with loss of focus? If the happens, whether our way of life be sedentary consequently of technology won't matter if this involves our overall health, because medicine will offset the side effects of deficiencies in exercise. [FIVE SENTENCES THAT DEVELOP &lifier Evaluate REASON 1]
Similarly, the argumentâ€™s conclusion is dependent around the assumption that enhancements in diet won't prevent or push away the loss of wellness that is a result of working in a high-tech job. [Subject SENTENCE FOR REASON 2] Whether itâ€™s reasonable to anticipate your diet to enhance as technology advances does not matter for this argument the reality is the author assumes that diet has virtually no effect on the overall well-being of an individual who will get no exercise. Yet a healthy diet plan could negate the results of the sedentary lifestyle. Actually, if a respectable diet might be proven to enhance oneâ€™s health, then it might be uncommon to summarize that the sedentary lifestyle instantly results in illness and elevated disease in everybody. There'd be no good way to show this type of correlation between exercise and health. Indeed, an inactive lifestyle combined with a decent diet could trigger a healthy body. [FIVE SENTENCES THAT DEVELOP &lifier Evaluate REASON 2]
The most important assumption produced by the writer to reach the final outcome would be that the past and offer are dependable indications of...