Researchers and also the press are showing more and more proof of global warming. Governmnets can't be likely to solve this issue. It's the responsibility of people to alter their lifestyle to avoid further damage.
What exactly are your sights?
You need to write a minimum of 250 words.
Give causes of the way to go and can include any relevant good examples out of your own understanding or experience.
SAMPLE ESSAY Rich In BAND SCORE: PART 2
Lately researchers concerned about global warming have advised government authorities introducing measures to lessen the green house gas pollutants which are viewed as its primary cause. Simoultaneouslty, political figures and environmentalists have advised people to create changes for their lifestyle. I shall reason that government authorities and people must take join responsibility with this problem.
First of all, industry makes up about the great majority from the green house gas pollutants, which are only able to be controlled by government action. Measures could automatically get to discourage pollution, for example restricting or taxing using non-renewable fuels. Alternatively, subsidies might be provided to industries to wash up their production processes. If these ideas were adopted, I have faith that companies would regard pollution like a financial problem.
Next, only discussion between government authorities can make sure that solutions are effective. The Kyoto agreement, for instance, attempted to achieve global agreement regarding how to address the issue. Without such co-operating, it appears in my experience that efforts to lessen fuel consumption are unlikely to work.
However, national and worldwide guidelines is only going to secceed if people also change their lifestyle. For instance, people could think more carefully about how exactly they will use energy within their houses. By utilizing less electricity, setting up energy-efficient bulbs and electrical home appliances, or trading in solar power panels, people can produce a real difference.
Additionally, I believe individual attitudes to move have to change. Rather than making short tips by vehicle, people could decide to walk, cycle, or have a bus. Since cars really are a major supply of the issue, altering our behavior in this region might have a significant impact.
To conclude, I'd maintain that just a mix of worldwide agreement, national guidelines, and alterations in individual behavior will flourish in stopping further harm to the atmosphere.