These OWL assets can help you develop and refine the arguments inside your writing.
Contributing factors:Stacy Weida, Karl Stolley
Last Edited: 2013-11-23 08:15:41
The thesis statement or primary claim should be debatable
An argumentative or persuasive written piece must start with a debatable thesis or claim. Quite simply, the thesis should be something which people could reasonably have varying opinions on. In case your thesis is one thing that's generally decided or recognized as fact then there's pointless to try and persuade people.
Illustration of a non-debatable thesis statement:
Pollution isn't good for that atmosphere.
This thesis statement isn't debatable. First, the term pollution implies that something isn't good or negative in some manner. Further, all studies agree that pollution is a concern they just disagree around the impact it'll have or even the scope from the problem. Nobody could reasonably reason that pollution is nice.
Illustration of a debatable thesis statement:
A minimum of a quarter of the government budget ought to be allocated to restricting pollution.
This really is one particualr debatable thesis because reasonable people could disagree by using it. Many people may think that this is the way we ought to spend the country's money. Others might believe that you should be investing more income on education. And others could reason that companies, not the federal government, ought to be having to pay to limit pollution.
Another illustration of a debatable thesis statement:
America's anti-pollution efforts should concentrate on independently possessed cars.
Within this example there's also room for disagreement between rational people. Some people may think concentrating on recycling programs instead of private automobiles is easily the most effective strategy.
The thesis must be narrow
Even though the scope of the paper might appear overwhelming in the beginning, usually the narrower the thesis the more suitable your argument is going to be. Your thesis or claim should be based on evidence. The larger your claim is, the greater evidence you will have to convince visitors that the position is appropriate.
Illustration of a thesis that's too broad:
Drug abuse is harmful to society.
You will find several reasons this statement is simply too broad to argue. First, what's incorporated within the category "drugs"? May be the author speaking about illegal drug abuse, leisure drug abuse (that might include alcohol and cigarettes), or all purposes of medication generally? Second, how are drugs harmful? Is drug abuse leading to deaths (and it is the writer equating deaths from overdoses and deaths from drug related violence)? Is drug abuse altering the moral climate or leading to the economy to say no? Finally, exactly what does the writer mean by "society"? May be the author mentioning simply to America in order to the worldwide population? Will the author make any among the results on children and grown ups? You will find way too many questions the claim leaves open. The writer couldn't cover all the subjects in the above list, the generality from the claim leaves many of these options available to debate.
Illustration of a narrow or focused thesis:
Illegal drug abuse is harmful since it encourages gang violence.
Within this example the subject of medication continues to be simplified lower to illegal drugs and also the hindrance continues to be simplified lower to gang violence. This can be a a lot more workable subject.